If an objection is filed it can take years,
depending on the grounds for your objection, before a decision is made, and if
your objection is rejected, your next option is an application for Taxpayer
Relief.
Where taxpayer relief is concerned, CRA has
said that you cannot file for relief of penalties or interest on tax years over
10 years old. The challenge is that many taxpayers, especially those who have
gone through the process of filing an objection - have their Taxpayer Relief applications rejected for this reason.
This is unfair because it is often the slow process of the CRA that causes
delays in processing that result in additional interest and result in the time
being stretched out.
Prior to 2011, the Canada Revenue Agency
(CRA) staunchly refused to grant relief from penalties and interest on a debt
that occurred more than ten years previous, stating that the Minister had no
power to grant taxpayer relief after the ten year period had passed. However,
in 2011, the Federal Court of Appeal heard the case of Bozzer v. The Queen, and the landmark decision changed things
significantly.
Bozzer v. The Queen: In December 2005, Mr.
Bozzer applied for relief of interest on a tax debt assessed for his 1989 and
1990 taxation years. This request was denied because CRA policy excludes debts over 10 years of age. Following
this rejection, Mr. Bozzer made his way up the court ladder, ending up in the
Federal Court of Appeal. It was determined that the Minister, based upon the
legislation which sets out to “administer the income tax system fairly and
reasonably by helping taxpayers to resolve issues,” should be able to use
his/her discretion with regard to all cases.
According to CRA’s website: “The FCA [Federal
Court of Appeal] found that the Minister has the discretion to cancel interest
that accrued during the 10 calendar years preceding the year in which the
request for relief is made, regardless of the tax year
in which the tax debt arose. For example, a request made in December 2011 for
the 1998 tax year, the Minister may cancel any interest that accrued during the
2001 to 2010 calendar years. Prior to this decision, the CRA's position was
that the Minister could not cancel any interest where the request was made more
than 10 calendar years after the end of the tax year in which the tax debt
arose.”
What does this mean? For taxpayers, this
decision means that it is up to the discretion of the Minister whether relief
can be granted, regardless of whether the 10 year period has passed – rather
than just receiving an outright no.
Sounds great right? Well in a perfect world CRA
would no longer refuse to consider a relief application that involved interest
and penalties over the 10 years preceding the application. Unfortunately we do
not live in a perfect world and so taxpayers continue to have their Taxpayer
Relief applications rejected, citing the 10 year rule even with the Bozzer
ruling on the books.
The challenge with the Taxpayer Relief
process is that:
1.
You may make a first application
2.
If rejected, you may provide more information and ask for another review
3.
If rejected you can ask for a judicial review = tax court
If you have had a first application rejected
because of the 10 year rule, then it is important that you have your second
review prepared professionally and cite the correct case law in order to
optimize your chances of being successful.
For more about Bozzer v. The Queen, the impacts to Taxpayer Relief, or to file for
relief, please contact Tax Solutions Canada by calling 1-888-868-1400 or visit
us at www.taxsolutionscanada.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment